In less than two days time
England embark on the next stage of their quest to win a Test series in Asia,
led by a new captain in Alastair Cook, but otherwise with largely the same
personnel that went to the UAE and Sri Lanka last winter. Expectations are low,
but on the face of it there should be little reason to believe that England cannot
win a first series in India since 1985.
In some quarters the tour has
been described as the beginning of a new era for English cricket, but in
reality the switch in leadership was all about continuity rather than change. Cook
has been groomed for captaincy since he first stepped into an England dressing
room seven years ago, has been one-day international captain for eighteen
months, and this is not even the first Test tour to the sub-continent that he’s
led - he stood in for Andrew Strauss in Bangladesh, and by all accounts did an
excellent job. Therefore, a change in team ethos is highly unlikely and rightly
so: under Strauss England became a highly professional and effective outfit, guided
by a world leading team of support staff. Expect Cook’s first target to be to
ensure that this is replicated under his command.
The make up of the team will
also have a familiar look to it when it is named after the toss in Ahmedabad on
Thursday. The enforced replacement of Strauss with Nick Compton, and the
inclusion of Stuart Broad (who was injured last spring) in place of the now crocked
Steven Finn are likely to be the only two changes from the 2nd Test
in Sri Lanka, a match which England won. That reflects the fact that despite an
unconvincing twelve months, there can be little dispute over who England’s best
players are. The batting unit may have failed in the sub-continent last winter,
but to my mind Cook, Jonathan Trott, Ian Bell and, yes, Kevin Pietersen are
world class batsmen, each of whom has shown ability to play spin in the past. Cook
and Trott have had success in Asia before, Pietersen has smashed Warne and
Murali to all parts, and Bell has scored runs in matches played on turning
pitches, albeit rarely in Asia. Matt Prior is undoubtedly the best ‘keeper-batsman
in the world game. Meanwhile, a disappointing effort against South Africa
aside, James Anderson and Stuart Broad have formed an incisive new ball
partnership in recent years. Tim Bresnan
lost form this summer, but all the evidence from the tour games suggests he’s
back in the sort of rhythm which has provided him with success against India in
the past.
Nevertheless, we should not
kid ourselves that this will be easy. Few teams have won Test series in India
within the last decade, and all batsmen that have faced Ravichandran Ashwin in
Asia have struggled thus far. It is likely that he’ll take the new ball,
ensuring that England’s batsmen are put under pressure from ball one, and
unable to take advantage of getting set against the seamers, as is their
preference. Pragyan Ojha is also a better left-arm spinner than he’s often
given credit for. These are not spinners that England can expect to bully, as
they did to Harbhajan Singh and Amit Mishra in England. But it is surely not
asking too much to expect top class international players, as so many of the
England line-up are, to play sensibly and effectively against slow bowling.
The Indian batting line-up
will present England with both hope and fear. It is hard to argue that this top
seven is any stronger than the group which failed to top 300 more than once against
these same England bowlers a short time ago, and Anderson, Broad and Bresnan
will feel they have a mental edge over Virender Sehwag, Gautam Gambhir and
Yuvraj Singh. Gambhir, in particular, would appear to have major technical
issues against the moving ball - an issue for an opening batsman. However,
India’s line-up like their home comforts, and Virat Kohli is in as good a form
as Amla was when England came across him in the summer. Unsurprisingly India
play spin particularly well, potentially negating the effectiveness of Graeme
Swann and Samit Patel.
So to the question of what
England need to do differently from their sub-standard efforts over the last
twelve months. Firstly, they need to take their catches - near perfect fielding
was a hallmark of the team in 2010 and 2011, but that seemed to slip last year.
Secondly, they must make sure they don’t panic against spin - there is no
reason why any of the batsmen ought to be technically incapable of playing slow
bowling so a better mental approach should do the trick. Finally, with the ball
they need to finish teams off: crucial lower order runs stopped them getting
away with some shaky batting efforts last year. Do all three of these things
well and a series win is well within England’s reach.
Overall, England should not
be daunted by this series. They are playing an opponent that suffered a 4-0
reversal at their hands last time round, and it is difficult to see how India
are a better team than they were then. Dealing with the Indian spinners is a
tough task for any batsman, but there is no reason why England’s line-up should
not be up to the challenge technically. Therefore, if Alastair Cook’s team are
able to win the mental war and replicate the professionalism demonstrated in
2010 and 2011, they stand a good chance of confounding the predictions and
defending the Pataudi Trophy. It won’t be easy but its certainly not
impossible.
Would like to mention something about R.Ashwin's bowling.He is a tall lad,and by his own admission,depends more on bounce variation to get the batsmen out.He has done well so far at home,and has a knack of picking top order wickets usually caught by men close around the bat.Keeping that in view it will be imperative that the English batsmen do not appear tentative against him;any deficiencies in technique or doubt in playing spin would cost them their wickets.However,if they are willing to graft and have the technique for it,Ashwin is one of those who keeps presenting scoring opportunities,mostly long hops around middle and leg.A very much your rhythm bowler too Ashwin.
ReplyDelete